Clinical Trial Execution  |  CRO Solutions

Deliver Better
Enrollment Performance.

Better referrals. More productive sites. Stronger study execution.

Sponsors expect enrollment results. Research sites need better information. AiSync helps CROs deliver both.

By introducing source-supported clinical evidence verification between patient identification and site screening, AiSync strengthens referral quality, identifies missing clinical information, and supports more efficient study execution—without replacing your existing recruitment strategy.

Site A Ready for Review
Site B Ready for Review
Site C In Progress
  • Support competitive proposals with a differentiated enrollment strategy.
  • Improve referral quality and the recruitment-to-site handoff.
  • Help sites be more productive with organized clinical evidence.
  • Strengthen study execution and sponsor relationships.

The CRO Balancing Act

Win the Study. Then Deliver on the Promise.

CROs must balance competitive sponsor bids with the operational reality of delivering enrollment performance.

Commercial PressureWin the business.
Competitive sponsor bids
Differentiated proposal strategy
Budget discipline
AiSync

A stronger clinical evidence handoff helps CROs excel on both sides.

Execution AccountabilityDeliver the outcomes.
Complex protocol requirements
Site burden
Enrollment milestone performance
The lowest initial bid isn’t always the most efficient enrollment strategy.

When referrals lack the evidence needed for meaningful evaluation, the resulting inefficiency affects the CRO, the site, and the sponsor.

Improve the Clinical Handoff

Make Your Existing Recruitment Strategy More Effective.

AiSync adds a clinical evidence verification layer between patient identification and site screening—improving referral quality, resolving evidence gaps, and supporting more efficient study execution.

Recruitment

Patient identification and engagement

Recruitment specialist reviewing a phone
  • Patient identification
  • Prescreening and outreach
  • Patient engagement
  • Recruitment partners and campaigns

Clinical verification layer

We retrieve, verify, and organize the right clinical evidence before it reaches your sites.

  1. 1

    Retrieve Records

    Collects available records from National Exchanges and identifies gaps.

  2. 2

    Resolve Gaps

    Targets specific providers for missing clinical evidence.

  3. 3

    Evaluate Evidence

    Assesses records against protocol inclusion and exclusion criteria.

  4. 4

    Clinical Summary

    A clear, source-cited summary with PASS / PASS WITH EXCEPTION / FAIL.

Research site review

Investigator eligibility decision

Physician reviewing clinical evidence
  • Complete, organized clinical evidence
  • Protocol-aligned summary
  • Source-cited hyperlinks to records
  • Investigator retains final eligibility authority
  • Higher Quality Referrals More complete clinical evidence before site review.
  • More Efficient Site Screening Sites spend less time on record retrieval and manual review.
  • Works With Your Existing Strategy Complements your recruitment partners, systems, and site workflows.
  • Scalable and Flexible Study-specific deployment and integration options.

Independent Third-Party Evaluation

Enrollment Performance Measured Across Studies and Sites.

An independent third-party analysis evaluated AiSync across multiple therapeutic areas, demonstrating meaningful improvements in key enrollment outcomes.

  • 52,386Patients
  • 1,672Sites
  • 9Studies
  • ~29Months

KEY ENROLLMENT OUTCOMES

  • +200%+Randomization improvement
  • +130%+Consent improvement
  • 18:1 → 3:1Screen-fail ratio improvement

Independent retrospective before-and-after evaluation conducted by a consulting firm commissioned by AES, a PPD-owned organization. Reported p-value: 0.001, with the specific tested endpoint to be identified in supporting documentation.

Stronger Site Performance

Give Sites a Head Start on Clinical Review.

AiSync reduces the manual record retrieval and pre-screening burden for research site coordinators by delivering a clear, organized, protocol-aligned evidence package—so they can focus on the tasks only they can perform.

HISTORICAL PHASE III COPD PROGRAM

Defined Coordinator Tasks: 180 Minutes → 35 Minutes Per Referral

BEFORE180 min
Defined coordinator tasks per referred patient
WITH AISYNC35 min
Same task scope in the historical comparison

80.6%Reduction in defined coordinator task time. Approximately 894 coordinator-hours of capacity across 370 referrals, based on the reported before-and-after task estimates. Not necessarily realized labor-cost savings.

Monitor showing the AiSync logo and Clinical Summary beside stacked medical records
FASTER TIME TO FIRST VISIT15 days → 5 days

Referral to first visit in the historical COPD program.

  • More Productive CoordinatorsLess time spent on record retrieval and manual review.
  • Higher Quality ReferralsSites receive organized, source-cited clinical evidence.
  • Faster Site ScreeningShorter time from referral to investigator review.
  • Supports Site RelationshipsHelps reduce site burden and improves the overall experience.

Flexible Commercial Deployment

Build a Stronger Enrollment Strategy Into Your Next Proposal.

AiSync can be incorporated into new study proposals, active studies, or long-term CRO partnerships—providing a study-specific approach, clear deliverables, and measurable value.

New Study Proposals

Differentiate your enrollment strategy with protocol-specific clinical verification.

  • Protocol-to-evidence blueprint
  • Workflow integration options
  • Study-specific budget and value model

Active Study Support

Introduce AiSync where referral quality or screening inefficiency needs attention.

  • Targeted verification cohorts
  • Define success measures
  • Rapid deployment with measurable impact

Strategic Partnerships

Establish repeatable workflows across studies and sponsors.

  • Preferred vendor relationships
  • Standardized playbooks
  • API integration options

The Commercial Principle. Scope clinical verification around the protocol’s actual evidence requirements, anticipated referral volume, and the points where screening inefficiency creates the greatest burden. A study-specific budget and projected value model should accompany the proposal—not a generic claim of guaranteed savings.

  • Strengthen ProposalsProvide a differentiated, execution-ready enrollment strategy.
  • Support Study ExecutionImprove referral quality and reduce downstream inefficiency.
  • Deliver Measurable ValueAlign on clear assumptions and performance measures.
  • Enable Long-Term PartnershipsBuild repeatable workflows across studies and sponsors.

Built to Work Together

Flexible Implementation. Seamless Integration.

AiSync complements your existing recruitment partners, site networks, and clinical systems—fitting seamlessly into your current workflows to strengthen the clinical evidence handoff.

01

Recruitment Ecosystem

Patient identification and engagement

  • Patient engagement
  • Prescreening
  • Recruitment partners
  • Site networks
02

Referral to AiSync

HIPAA authorization and record retrieval

03

CLINICAL EVIDENCE VERIFICATION

  • National Exchanges and digital connections
  • Targeted provider retrieval and gap resolution
  • Protocol-aligned evidence evaluation
  • AiSync Clinical Summary with page-cited hyperlinks
04

Site Review

Investigator eligibility decision

Hospital exterior
05

Study Execution

Improved referral quality and site productivity

  • Higher quality referrals
  • More efficient screening
  • Reduced site burden
  • Faster time to evaluation

Implementation Options

Study-Specific Pilot

Start with defined referral volumes.

Managed Workflow

AiSync portal with centralized coordination.

Partner Integration

API options for seamless data exchange.

Scalable Deployment

Expand across studies and therapeutic areas.

  • Complements Your EcosystemWorks with your existing recruitment and site partners.
  • Fast and FlexibleDeploy quickly with scalable options.
  • Secure and CompliantHIPAA-aligned processes and audit-ready documentation.
  • Built for Long-Term SuccessRepeatable workflows across studies and sponsors.

Real Results for CROs

Measurable Impact
Across the Enrollment Journey.

Independent third-party analysis by a top-3 global CRO demonstrates significant improvements in key enrollment outcomes with AiSync.

CRO and clinical leaders reviewing enrollment results

Screen-fail ratio

18:1 → 3:1

Fewer unnecessary screening visits

Randomization

+200%+

More eligible patients reaching randomization

Consent

+130%+

More patients moving from referral to consent

Time to evaluation

26–36 days→ 1–3 days

From referral to evaluation

Site efficiency

13.4hours per week

Saved per site

98%

of sites requested reuse on future studies.

STUDY SCOPE

Independent analysis across 52,386 patients, 9 studies, over ~29 months, and 1,672 sites.

AiSync consistently delivered higher-quality referrals, reduced screen fails, and improved enrollment velocity across a diverse set of therapeutic areas.INDEPENDENT THIRD-PARTY ANALYSIS BY A TOP-3 GLOBAL CRO
  • Higher Quality ReferralsMore eligible patients reach sites and consent.
  • More Efficient SitesLess time on manual review and fewer unnecessary visits.
  • Faster Study ExecutionShorter time to evaluation accelerates enrollment timelines.
  • Scalable ImpactProven across multiple studies, therapeutic areas, and site networks.

Better Enrollment Execution
Starts With Better Clinical Evidence.

Whether you are preparing a sponsor proposal, supporting an active study, or strengthening a recruitment partnership, AiSync can help evaluate how clinical evidence verification fits your strategy.

Bring us a protocol, an enrollment challenge, or an upcoming opportunity. We’ll help identify the right deployment approach.

  • Protocol assessment
  • Partnership planning
  • Clinical evidence strategy
Scroll to Top